F criticized. Guimarães “disparity of treatment” in possible penalty kicks in his favour in the match with Benfica, in which Andre Andre and Sfera are involved. FC Minho wonder why the VAR in that match did not call referee Rui Costa in the play between Andre Andre and Florentino, but did so in the play between Savera and Flacodimos, where he ended up reversing his decision to set the maximum penalty.
Why, in an effort in which the analysts unanimously and undoubtedly evaluated the bid on Andre Andre as a consequential foul penalty, the VAR decided, within 25 seconds, that the transfer was not only not a foul but also unworthy of the chief referee’s appeal For the observer to analyze human error is part of football and it is acceptable to all players, especially those on the field during the course of the match, but to watch the match behind a screen, with all conditions to evaluate the game’s movements, and even if you think that such a blatant move is not worth the error, you can only To show incompetence or bad intentions, because human error cannot be,” the Guimarães people said in a statement.
Related
V. Guimarães also requests the disclosure of the VAR audios, a proposal from Sporting that has previously failed but now intends to agree: “We will request an urgent hearing from the FPF and FIFA, with the aim of making it possible for the above-mentioned votes must be revealed, and in order to return to the polling station of the General Assembly of LaLiga Portugal, and in other cases needing approval, the proposal made by Sporting CP and rejected by the clubs, including Vitória SC, taking into account the negative opinion of the arbitration board, at the time, that the proposal was not Compliant with data protection law and with IFAB and FIFA indicators.”
Statement by V. Guimarães:
Vitoria Sport Club reinforces and confirms its dissatisfaction with the performance of the Video Assistant Referee, Luis Ferreira, and Avar, Sergio Jesus, in the match against SL Benfica, which was held last Saturday, at the Estadio de Afonso Henrique.
Silence is not a solution to an issue that affected Vitoria SC this weekend, but in the future this could affect any of the teams competing in this tournament, and this once again exposed the weaknesses in operating the video refereeing tool. .
The way in which there has been a disparity in the treatment of the bids in which our players Andre Andre and Sophie have been involved is something worth reflecting on, and above all clarifying.
Why was the head referee Rui Costa not called to see the on-screen images of André’s presentation, in which he made no mention of anything in the ongoing match and was misled by the match’s VAR not being called to review an attempt, but was directed by VAR to do so in a Sapphire attempt Where did the main referee whistle for a penalty kick?
Why, in an effort in which the analysts unanimously and undoubtedly evaluated the bid on Andre Andre as a foul penalty, and the VAR decided, within 25 seconds, that the bid was not just a mistake. But is it not worth inviting the referee to the observer for analysis?
Human error is part of football, and all players, especially those on the pitch, are allowed during the course of the match. But watching the match from behind the screen, with all the conditions to evaluate the game’s movements, and even when considering that such a blatant move is not worth the error, can only prove incompetence or bad faith, because human error cannot be.
We have to train better and demand and punish those who do not have the quality to use VAR. What are we waiting for there to be standardization of procedures regarding the relationship between the main referee and VAR/AVAR?
Questions that Vitoria Sport Club would like to answer and that deserve clarification from all the clubs that compete in this, and in other competitions, where VAR technology works, which will help to dispel the climate of doubt and rebellion in the face of the unreasonable. Such a decision happened last Saturday, where the sporting truth ended up being affected, obscuring important points in the league table.
Therefore, the Vitoria Sport Club requested an audience to the arbitration board of the Portuguese Football Federation, to view the bids that took place not only in this game, but also in the matches against SC Braga and FC Arauca.
Knowing also that Vitoria Sport Club is a hundred-year-old institution and that it has always worked in the interest of the development of Portuguese football, it is aware that other kinds of measures must be taken, from the very beginning, to display the voice between the referee teams on the field and VAR / AVAR.
VAR is synonymous with transparency. Everyone in favor of mathematical truth should support the existence of VAR technology as a tool of paramount importance, and for the benefit of mathematical truth. But if VAR contributes significantly to sporting truth, it cannot remain closed due to the opacity of communications between key referees and the VAR system. Transparency requires it. Mathematical truth dictates that.
To achieve this goal, Vitória Sport Clube will request an urgent hearing from the FPF and FIFA, with a view to enabling the disclosure of the aforementioned acoustics, and in order to return it to the polling station of the Liga Portugal General Assembly, and other bodies needing approval, the proposal submitted by Sporting CP and rejected clubs, including Vitória SC, taking into account the negative opinion given by the arbitration board, at the time, that the proposal did not comply with data protection law and with IFAB and FIFA guidelines.
“Food fanatic. Organizer. Hipster-friendly tv specialist. Avid reader. Devoted web ninja.”
