British government proposes reform of human rights law – Criticized by NGOs – Observer

The British Minister of Justice on Tuesday proposed a reform of the United Kingdom’s human rights law to impose “public knowledge” and prevent “abuse”, meaning “foreign criminals are trying to avoid deportation”, but this has been criticized by organizations. NGOs).

In a statement to the House of Commons, Minister Dominic Robb announced the opening of a three-month consultative session, after which a new “Bill of Rights” would be tabled in Parliament and replaced with the current text, which includes the European Convention on Human Rights. (ECHR).

The minister promised that the reform would be criticized by organizations such as Amnesty International (AI). Wants to keep the UK one of ECHR’s 47 signatoriesCreated on, 1950 By the Council of Europe, an organization outside the EU.

However he acknowledged that their numbers were not enough to defeat British courts in Strasbourg, France.

Rob argued The new bill will strengthen freedom of expression, Instead of “European-style” privacy protection law, would “more clearly” define the distinction between the judiciary and the legislature.

This proposal seeks to introduce the need for the judiciary to obtain “permission” beforehand, thereby proving that the attorney has suffered a “significant disadvantage” before seeking compensation for the abuse of his rights. Courts should assess the general interest and conduct of the plaintiff when making decisions regarding possible compensation, he said.

In his speech to the delegates, he pointed out the fact that Rob had been abused. 70% of human rights cases won in court are by foreign criminals Those who use Section 8 of the Right to Family Life to appeal deportation orders.

The government’s proposal responds to the persistent demands of the Conservative right, which considers that current human rights law puts European law ahead of national law.

In response to the plan, Stephanie Boys of the Law Society, which represents lawyers in the UK and Wales, said judges could now overrule the Strasbourg case law “if there is a legal reason to do so” and the majority of the proposed new skills were argued. “Already exists”.

Any reform of this sophisticated and carefully crafted legal instrument must be evidence-based and not driven by political rhetoric, ”he added.

Martha Spurier, a human rights NGO in Liberty, called the legislation an “attempt by the administration to seize more power” and warned that the UK would align itself with “dictatorial regimes” if it tried to intervene in Amnesty International’s court rulings. “I do not like it.”