:strip_icc()/i.s3.glbimg.com/v1/AUTH_59edd422c0c84a879bd37670ae4f538a/internal_photos/bs/2022/8/A/TDXAxrQpmQB9ioCGegrw/pontuacaoparasaude.jpg)
This is why it would be important to adopt a rating system like this to have a global scale. The tool, which was created and improved by the team at Riverside University Health System, in California, was tighten last month in “NEJM Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery.” The questionnaire consists of 28 questions covering six areas, the initials of which are PERSON: sphysical health (physical health), And themotor health (mental health), suse of electronic resources (use of medical resources, such as emergency room visits and use of medications), sPeripheral economics (education, employment, housing and finance data), aWinning (something like the ability to self-manage, with a self-assessment of one’s effectiveness) and numberMortality and lifestyle.
The groups were selected, based on a comprehensive review of the specialized literature, as factors affecting life expectancy, mortality, and longevity. In each field, the patient receives a letter going from A (best grade) to Z (worst) and there is also a color scheme depending on the severity of the condition and the need for intervention, ranging from red (problematic), through yellow (medium) to green (satisfactory). Between August 2020 and October 2021, more than ten thousand assessments were made. The areas most at risk were nutrition, lifestyle, and emotional health.
